![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/americas/03/24/food.ap/index.html
This is even more reason why we must grow some of our own food, and why we should encourage public gardens and the sowing of urban crops wherever we can. A food shortage can be reversed in 4 months if we make the effort needed to end it. Maybe we won’t be getting wheat or rice in 4 months, but we can get greens and carrots and potatoes.
“The U.N.'s World Food Program says it's facing a $500 million shortfall in funding this year to feed 89 million needy people.”
I don’t understand this – I donate more now than I have in the past, and I know others who have increased their donations. Are we the abberration or the norm, and if we’re the norm, where is all that money going?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Plus, there have been harvest failures in Argentina and Australia, adding to the problem, and corn being grown for fuel, not food.
Lots of little things piling up to make something big.
(no subject)
Plus, there are lots of little things we can do to decrease or at least ease the food shortage in the short term, if we'd just do them: eliminating HFCS in our diet (who'd miss it, really?), encouraging the growing of food in non-traditional places and ways, and using our vaunted technology to help these underdeveloped nations grow their own food. It only takes one growing season to start seeing results.
So why aren't we doing it?
(no subject)
And like you, I've declared HFCS and other not-really-food additives non-players in my diet.
As for our 'vaunted technology', it does more harm to developing countries than good. Monsanto is particularly insidious with their 'terminator' seeds and other devious ways to part people from their money by making them buy seeds every year rather than saving them and reseeding on their own. I would like to see us use our intellectual and analytical firepower to help people in such places do what they already do better.
I've reversed the whole local/global paradigm- while I think globally, I prefer to act locally. I feel that we need to pull back from national and global concerns and concentrate on our own areas, and the interfaces with our neighboring areas. Smaller coverage makes for finer interaction.
One of my friends is taking a master gardener class, and is sharing what she is learning with me. The state Cooperative Extension people encourage this, and we hope that something wonderful (besides my garden) will result. I get to be the guinea pig!
(no subject)
I agree that we must act locally even as we interact and think globally. And we need to instill this attitude around the world - other people need to act in their local areas to help themselves and their neighbors instead of looking for handouts from other nations or fighting one another over resources and control of resources.
(no subject)
this is one of those areas where the laws are a good chunk of the problem for relatively *insane* reasons, and completely need to be overhauled for better working. globally, between America and Russia, there's literally no reason why we shouldn't be able to feed everyone on the planet, easily, every year, unless we have another 1930s drought + depression again. and the depression bit may hit, but we're not in the same serious drought conditions as back then.
-bs
(no subject)
-bs
(no subject)